A few things surprised me about the website:
1) This claim in the FAQ:
"There is a profound gap between the knowledge and skills most students learn in school and the knowledge and skills they need in typical 21st century communities and workplaces."I have always viewed the younger generations as very technologically capable. I'm starting to see that there is a difference between having an iPod and having technological skills.
2) The idea that a rigorous, challenging curriculum is a necessary 21st century skill. I have always equated "rigorous" with "more." I'm a big supporter of extracurricular activities and athletics in high school. I think that they teach students valuable skills and would caution against increasing the rigor of courses at the expense of extracurriculars.
However, I'm beginning to see that rigorous does not always equal more. In fact, rigorous can just as easily mean less. It's all about the type of questions we pose to students and the lessons we have them complete. My job as a teacher has to become more rigorous as I seek to challenge students.
3) I was surprised by the number of states already on board with the Partnership. It's great to see that they have already been successful in reaching so many states. I'm hopeful that the next step will be for P21 to go national, similar to No Child Left Behind.
As an educator, I first need to get more familiar with the P21 initiatives. I would like to take a closer look at what is being done at the state level. While doing so, I need to emphasize P21 skills in my classroom. As a history teacher, I would place emphasis on global studies and communication. I believe that having broader goals than the content of the classroom will make me a better teacher and the students, hopefully, better learners.